Compared honestly.
Five tools people weigh against AZ-Five, each written up the same way: where they're stronger first, then side by side, then the fares. If you're choosing, this is the page to start from.
Five comparisons.
- AZ-FIVE VS POSTHOG
- Product analytics is one line here, not the whole map.
- PostHog is open source and can be self-hosted right now. AZ-Five is hosted; self-hosting is planned but not shipped.
- Read the comparison
- AZ-FIVE VS AMPLITUDE
- Behavioral analytics, without the analytics silo.
- Journeys, predictive cohorts and behavioral modeling refined over years for very large product organizations.
- Read the comparison
- AZ-FIVE VS METABASE
- The dashboard is the easy part.
- Metabase’s core is open source and runs on your own hardware right now. AZ-Five is hosted; self-hosting is planned but not shipped.
- Read the comparison
- AZ-FIVE VS DATABRICKS
- The same lakehouse. Without the platform team.
- Spark-scale compute, notebooks, experiment tracking, model serving and training infrastructure — a complete ML platform AZ-Five does not attempt.
- Read the comparison
- AZ-FIVE VS LOOKER
- Governed metrics, without the modeling language.
- A mature, versioned modeling language with years of tooling, patterns and expertise around it.
- Read the comparison
How these are written.
- Their strengths first
- Every page opens with what the other tool does better. A comparison that can’t say that isn’t one.
- Only shipped capability
- The AZ-Five column lists what works today. Nothing planned, nothing “coming soon”, no migration tooling that doesn’t exist.
- Fares as published, dated
- Their pricing is quoted from their own page as read on a stated date, with a link to check it. Ours comes from the same source as the fare table.
WRONG ABOUT SOMEONE? HELLO@AZ-FIVE.COM · WE FIX IT
Or skip the reading and try it.
Unlimited seats, every feature, no card. Bring one dataset and compare against the real thing.